| Re: [tablatures] Baroque lute tablature |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/tablatures Archives
]
- To: "Patrick Schmidt" <p.l.schmidt@xxxxxx>, <tablatures@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [tablatures] Baroque lute tablature
- From: "Trevor Daniels" <t.daniels@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:58:09 -0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:reply-to :from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=9LMukwYWm3BbpWv1E0eiLVLg51/2Fm97v7XiY7PUe6U=; b=Er1O6NAnE/dhdawebUqCERsJnlroxR1E1Ejo1EwVTgC9hk4+TDnFFHnvEpgSi+UagX V0v+eQ+5spE1n0zhrpRK9fJ+FgTEMuTJAhkyBQaHRR4r10a69EhKKHWocao0gLYkpkq3 C/KtTS+BcxCrFCKBs9RKQI++pmii6bf1cl4tc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:reply-to:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=tC+a7dkueHViW2JB/16g3vt4J0NMuNhR/hVXswa4H8n50LJpg0l70odU/m3DnhE5iu dPEvoFsBAPUS8XG2FMNE/fVQ7OLO5EF3cIXnHjQwlniDGN3fv3fUYxKB2iIutlLHqIaO qwJqJ4Ln9q22xKTRUbqOBL7F/9/E+3be5AHAU=
Patrick Schmidt wrote Sunday, November 15, 2009 7:25 PM
Von: "Trevor Daniels" <t.daniels@xxxxxxxxxxx>
d) I haven't yet looked into adding the decorations (the comma,
the
small curve and line under notes) mainly because I'm not sure
what
they represent musically.
comma: means appogiatura from above (Pull off, "accent") if it
appears to the right of a letter. I believe it can also take the
form of ")" or "^"
small curve under notes: means appogiatura from below (Hammer on,
Mersenne calls it "accent plaintif")
line *above* notes: means appogiatura from a semitone below
("half-fall")
Ah, thanks! That makes more sense now.
e) But the big lesson is that transcribing from tab to tab via
notemode is totally impractical. I and many lutenists do not
know what pitch a particular fingering generates. A tabmode
entry
form will be essential. This has some obvious difficulties,
the main one being the lack of information about how accidentals
should be represented when outputted in a standard staff. Not
sure what to do about this.
I'm not sure if I understand the problem. Wouldn't it be rather
clear how to represent accidentals if users were to add a
\key-command in tabmode like \key d \minor and the tuning of the
strings (in combination with some LilyPond-definitions for each
key of the most probable accidentals that should be outputted in
standard staff, e.g. in d minor: c sharp instead of d flat)?
If the key is known a good guess can usually be made,
but not if the key modulates.
OK, I've rambled on long enough. What I want to know is whether
I should continue with this.
yes, please!
OK, I'll continue. Next step is set out an implementation
plan.
Trevor