| Re: [frogs] After capo handler comes capo key |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] After capo handler comes capo key
- From: Jan Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoulliego@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 23:06:12 +0200
- Cc: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>, Lilypond Frogs <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FWeCjD3tXLfSGVAWjjp236nqWin2S/4Y/O3RrY4QDDw=; b=RC74iQJqIBCUOuleX/8Zs/vsF/PV9tKAzCzsZwy407ycrnpP1XFbg379Xg6rBCj6Af YvXlSCCs81DNrZSg3Q5/sFVywMaoWE7zrT5SNfgRO93Ius5HgrrUqdz23MhPM/i69cq/ NbP+inHdgATrCdXOQfUxO7tXGS++2UdBW39yE=
2011/8/2 Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 02/08/11 21:16, Jan Warchoł wrote:
>>> I've done it as a .scm file despite make-music-function only working as
>>> > a .ly - because kate does colour-formatting etc, and it's easier to work
>>> > that way :-)
>> Do you want it uploaded to Rietveld? If so, where in the source
>> should i paste it? Anywhere in scm/chord-names.scm will do?
>>
> Does it really belong on Rietveld at the moment?
Perhaps not, then :)
> I know you said Scheme was not your strong point :-) but this code
> doesn't belong in a .scm file (it should be in a .ly), and I haven't
> attempted to compile it because I'm pretty certain it'll crash and burn
> spectacularly :-)
:)
> If it should go on Rietveld, great, but I was hoping a frog-master would
> help me get it into a rather better state before it was subjected to the
> ridicule of the wider community :-)
Then it's good that i resisted the temptation to cc this thread to devel :P
Somehow i very rarely post anything not on devel...
cheers,
Janek
---
----
Join the Frogs!