| Re: [frogs] Guitar capo code in scheme |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] Guitar capo code in scheme
- From: Jan Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoulliego@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:03:48 +0200
- Cc: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lilypond Frogs <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0CcX6Uu1lz9adt4KDTD7bot22umYvU2R3GhgnZCF+Ew=; b=iHEV5SYzSfc/cVgIRnVKujHfL+Stcv3PvM4LtREg9ImQzhylFFnKG9J2DqNXKjtyXX jVf+j6AJ8rkcihcMsarMxEA5yk3XCrOFfgUA6Dnob3u06lCIGhqTXGJGZU732E67t+tH qXhuDs+agTBf/uhjkFHKlSPCzvaYYxZOj7r5E=
W dniu 25 lipca 2011 23:45 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
<c_sorensen@xxxxxxx> napisał:
>
> On 7/25/11 3:34 PM, "Wols Lists" <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 25/07/11 22:28, Jan Warchoł wrote:
>>> I get it too...
>>> I tried inserting random parentheses, but it didn't work.
>
> Random parentheses *never* work in Scheme; they only cause more problems.
>
> In C++ it's possible to add parentheses without causing problems; in Scheme
> every time you add a parenthesis you create a new evaluation.
I know... I'm not Schematic enough. I just wanted to try anything,
thought that maybe i'd save Wol some time by sheer luck :)
>>> I've uploaded your new patch set to Rietveld
>>> (http://codereview.appspot.com/4800051), hopefully it will help in
>>> pinpointing the problem with Scheme syntax.
>>> My apologies for delay!
>>>
>>> thanks for your work!
>>> Janek
>>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> As always, the problem is finding time, I'm planning to delete most of
>> the code and put it back line by line - taking a sort of "divide and
>> conquer" to try and work out what's wrong. I just need a bit of time
>> when I don't have the wife and grandkids after me :-)
>
> Did my revised patch not get to you? It works.
No, i didn't get it at all! I don't see it in frog archives neither.
> Please don't try to go
> through line-by-line! That would be a frustrating experience and a poor use
> of your limited time.
>
> I've reattached the patch to this email. It should apply to master.
It does and i see no errors, everything fine! Updated Rietveld.
Thanks Carl, you are great as usual!
Janek
---
----
Join the Frogs!