| Re: [frogs] chord-name-engraver plus capo - schemeing away ... |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] chord-name-engraver plus capo - schemeing away ...
- From: Neil Puttock <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:17:17 +0100
- Cc: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lilypond Frogs List <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B7xy+ifAucGzFwvuAkXIRdH6FYJxpqKuKSwXTIUVAEs=; b=VH8dznCEwaDq25Kr0hD/t7+lnj18/Sf6NTaQPGff7sd22iD34xcgK3pQpi1vpWXSIf FNgePWWoArO17N32JAi/llOpRZ1KSXmJp304OzK03yTsjWHtvCD9Ol4ZWlytZiV4QQww t7fic+rMsJvEOAgrCcrFqbCFGqafNy/NZ+0z4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E3Mnpf3iaBAEjs6ikZZYMvkrU+RnUNlJVlk7cqltIjYEaVy9rmzKkG9E3eDJpVmTgh zPSgxFNQOdaV8FDjVjdfDrEjJZeFUYDifVCNlOcyaAkUHfbx35wOUVPWF49yJEjpI3UH Wjy5oc1rrgkyXtVvnFZKyGme5C2PA/YX3c9so=
On 28 August 2010 19:02, Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> There's a work in process to rewrite the chord name function. I think that
> the approach that Anthony is taking is correct.
Is it ever going to be finished? It's been in process for about a
year unless I'm mistaken; you posted a patch on Rietveld from Thomas
earlier this year, but I haven't seen progress since.
I still think it's better to do this in scheme (and that doesn't mean
as a scheme engraver); even if we ever get to the stage where the
chord name infrastructure does get rewritten, it shouldn't prevent
other enhancements being made earlier, especially if they're
implemented in a modular fashion.
Cheers,
Neil
---
----
Join the Frogs!