| Re: [frogs] [PATCH:] Harmonics and ties in tablature |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Marc Hohl <marc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] [PATCH:] Harmonics and ties in tablature
- From: Neil Puttock <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:28:06 +0100
- Cc: "frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cYaqulKdR0VVlnOTfS0atXbeq2m18ZRr6M0dhICXV1A=; b=T6P25eKt+w//YZsfA5EyeRkwC4pWeMWO35QKU3oU6r92g30GmOiIXKT1uV3GKoV0BV Q2CehJ+MhKr/g+unT7K/nlv5C6bj4hatRliBYlEQPmpbdSUs0jV0W9SC7dKkeXv8qDOm rvRueeico9yJ0BzO/lFFcO8czmTPB3XhysHq8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=HHmljHLeRYb/bRhTbe9CBVXDG/car+g1yRw4+ycDPP7Fkl4WLuzJ3gzDZGzISLBLa7 /cS253uMfYFjoDLbl5GKKIlBcQhZ2jwU08U4JCfTHLR7lNQtlcb2MP0W8HMxrTS3BuwI AJehz5QPzjc/KogwWOjfansSgpdvPvaCMCVn0=
On 13 June 2010 09:34, Marc Hohl <marc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The patch isn't 100% correct yet. If you compile the new regression file,
> the
> fret number disappears in the second line. In larger documents, the number
> seems to (dis)appear at random - I don't know why this happens.
The TabNoteHead and HarmonicParenthesesItem have the same default
'layer, which leads to the hamonic brackets sometimes being applied
after the note head.
> PS: for personal clarification: Since I am not a native speaker, I am not
> sure
> when I should use "parentheses" or "brackets". These () are parentheses,
> and these <> are angled parentheses, isn't it?
I'd call <> angle brackets (or "less than" & "greater than").
The harmonic brackets look more like chevrons than parentheses.
Cheers,
Neil
---
----
Join the Frogs!