| [frogs] Re: Lilypond and Guile forward compatibility |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Ian Hulin <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [frogs] Re: Lilypond and Guile forward compatibility
- From: Patrick McCarty <pnorcks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:00:53 -0700
- Cc: Lilypond Frogs List <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GU6Tdw1DrQ2JXmubkEjNLDJ6I8bxkUN93gDb2BhmAnU=; b=mVKDmkLP6bqpXlD+mejm85OrgZ/vuLyAjxmUjk7WSFmc3OkAmuZm/0Q1eIDt7b05Sc WR/AYRmqylaZA7vE3ENqLeyMYYIsVzXCOAwL+NTjOBD4rD3vodZoZdnVHu8v+1/cewul EWiy7EB7QwFjDm9ajhR7pThk65Pce+wg2QlsQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=r4nr0tdHqSbPhWWNAQ+N3FNFXi3GER2qMFEAHbdPdAI6Xnnf+5aKWJWyinJk4V3/N+ c/cqvbiuBPZSDrjjsfORyfDBF5Ef9S/cdz24DSc36OrOULx3cYRtiYMIexEvf2HQStse XQsgXpbYBB13NY4BBi80ME30Q2YZj24mmLNG4=
Hi Ian,
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Ian Hulin <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've now rebuilt Lilypond OK after eliminating the space LDFLAGS, but it
> still fails in the same place in the build. It links the image but
> Segfaults when trying to run it to build the docs,
> It's still dying in ly_init_ly_module when the array pointer reaches 976
> and it's trying to execute Accidental_placement_init_ifaces().
> It's not getting as far as the call to
> scm_primitive_load_path (scm_from_locale_string ("lily.scm"));
> which is presumable what executes lily.scm.
It seems very odd that you are seeing a segfault here.
I'm not really sure what to suggest, but can you post the backtrace
after you hit the segfault?
Does Guile 1.9.10 work okay for you in general, e.g. at the repl?
I'll post back if I discover any leads for you.
Thanks,
Patrick
---
----
Join the Frogs!