Re: [frogs] Help with the Guile debugger

[Ian Hulin <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

Hi Trevor,
On 08/01/10 00:38, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Ian
>
> Thanks, but I can't apply this as it would remove many recent changes
> to the CG.  Could you please rebase your branch onto a fresh git
> pull of master and make a new patch for me.
>
> Trevor

Attached is a patch after a rebase.

Cheers,

Ian


> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Hulin" <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Trevor Daniels" <t.daniels@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Patrick McCarty" <pnorcks@xxxxxxxxx>; <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 12:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [frogs] Help with the Guile debugger
>
>
> > Hi Trevor,
> >
> > On 07/01/10 23:55, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > > Patrick McCarty wrote Thursday, January 07, 2010 7:10 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > > At the prompt, if I manually invoke "(use-modules (scm
> > > > guile-debugger))", then the bindings (set-break!, etc.) become
> > > > visible.
> > >
> > > This seems to be a viable way to debug Scheme code.  I'd be happy
> > > to amend the CG to say this, but there may be more problems.
> > > If I set a break-point and enter (quit) the debugger is entered at the
> > > break-point as it should be.  All the debug commands seem to work
> > > fine, except for finish.  This produces the error:
> > >
> > > Internal debugger error:
> > > usr/share/guile/1.8/ice-9/debugger/command-loop.scm:51:6:
> > > In procedure throw in expression (apply throw key ...):
> > > usr/share/guile/1.8/ice-9/debugger/command-loop.scm:51:6:
> > > Unbound variable: trace-trap
> > work-round - use quit or continue at the debug> prompt instead.
> > > Not sure if this is relevant or due to my lack of familiarity with
> > > the guile debugger.
> > >
> > > > Somehow `lilypond-module' needs to remember that it is using the
> > > > guile-debugger module *before* `top-repl' is invoked.
> > >
> > > This would be better if you can figure out a way to do it.
> >
> > Attached patch should do this.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ian
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________        This email has 
> been scanned by Netintelligence        
> http://www.netintelligence.com/email