Re: [frogs] Changing subproperties with grob-set-property (working on bug #40) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [frogs] Changing subproperties with grob-set-property (working on bug #40)
- From: Neil Puttock <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:40:29 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XMRz1MhHhpVhA6/nw0qjYWp2jLEPpKr6YxyIy1dPEy8=; b=QYb1SmaNGR2bl/qtaAONPErxO5uBAuHG9Xr/pbYr6BBOMyrxqUYazOD7BVfBepSySL kOBcQS6wPr4ur008KUJJYBZq+AptVWPkMjJ+y1/jaHZnSl8F4h/8fhRAgqyfMEAhjHr5 /0heZJ1oz6LqFz0kUWpl2ZR8grA9DR5geTG74=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=NU+reFO6clrvWQmnVtIMGCPu5km9D+2sKhDzFtAZduuezEb1XA4CkxrVMDLo5Ts/+v RVaja68IGOgSIG09+IvtYFWf2yIcFhyPrSQy1cLC3uHXDG9FEY8eJgtWpfeEXsxQImV2 bHoAgNcr5RO6rX3tMlnHD7kb632kVMECH4Ng8=
2009/11/3 Marc Hohl <marc@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> I just copied this part from the definition of ly:grob-set-property!
> and pasted it (as I never stop to mention: this is all very unfamiliar to
> me,
> so it just looked ok).
I hope you're compiling between changes though, otherwise you won't
know whether it's working.
> Is there an alternative for this check, or should I
> simply
> drop it completely?
You'll have to remove it.
I don't think it matters too much, since you've already ensured the
property path is a list.
> I am not sure whether this would be a better solution; I am learning
> slowly, but I think that sooner or later I have to dive into the c++ code,
> so if you don't loose your patience with me, I'll follow this task to
> whatever end
OK, though you still might consider it a useful exercise to try a
Scheme implementation too. :)
Regards,
Neil
---
----
Join the Frogs!