| [frogs] Re: Discourse on the Consumption of Dog Food |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Graham Percival <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [frogs] Re: Discourse on the Consumption of Dog Food
- From: Joe Neeman <joeneeman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:08:19 -0800
- Cc: Maximilian Albert <maximilian.albert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx, lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GoXRGasIqlvU7ZCUeNTTRLyOU4M28L22UFIZMe2O3nM=; b=mCSk9BeqyMdKHYHV6/+XK/xOQvhXrS3tM0JYCo/ZdwFkz49t7GZTZVFwXwCIhsXHkX 57T5ij6/iuHCI06yJUBIvitfV2Ows7XcfHBIqc8wuBmrc7F5M1uM1g33cgEEmhLVyKla 6I9QXkWP3WiEE1zY8nca3xq5A7Zx6kEeVRifk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=SdLX9EZYumndMSpS6S4rO/9s+TRFo2a89dDxNEX1hGZA6b2f6XZbW1RbYJXiRfdcr5 bOuCJ75ylWWTxzsuX2TRWhZniHd1A/JOWtSBhvFaCUTCIpX0DGB7mW5ujLf7PSb83Wn3 xaojWzj5nXhFKX/NiUmh4+n+Od+dNnqQHpJOA=
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 23:08 +0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 07:03:19PM +0100, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> > Just a few random nitpicks so far (I haven't read the whole thing, though):
>
> Ok. Chapter 7 is mostly Carl's domain, but I'll fix most of these
> issues.
>
> > - The last word in 7.3 must read "ineffective" instead of "inefective".
> > - In the third item in 7.4.11 it should be "E.g." instead of "Eg"
> > after the first sentence.
>
> Done, although as a general rule I wouldn't fuss about things like
> E.g. vs. Eg in the CG. (rhyme not intentional)
>
>
> > - In the fourth item in 7.4.11, is the call to message() really
> > correct? Shouldn't 'Calculating line breaks...' also be surrounded by
> > quotation marks?
>
> Done, although I'm wondering about this now. For example,
>
> gperciva@nagi:~/svn/lilypond/lily$ grep Calculating *
> minimal-page-breaking.cc: message (_ ("Calculating line
> breaks..."));
> minimal-page-breaking.cc: message (_ ("Calculating page
> breaks..."));
> page-turn-page-breaking.cc: message (_f ("Calculating page and
> line breaks (%d possible page breaks)...",
> paper-score.cc: message (_ ("Calculating line breaks...") + " ");
>
> Anybody know what the difference is between
> message(_
> and
> message(_f
_f() is like _() plus printf. That is, it allows you to format
arguments.
---
----
Join the Frogs!