| Re: Next Cooking or RC - Few questions |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Next Cooking or RC - Few questions
- From: Allan Pinto <allan316@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:22:24 +0530
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KqXjVAbqXDJiYyzERJrJl9+0Ac8TuZkSZZJrOHxxLM8=; b=CohZcqrBHa/kbLzxJIkedm7/x+Vms/V47Y7wQBYMUDdawiIUyv6OTfbN+Oapjt6rBp O17o4EiW8xwiamI5KRQM29aZ4SvWkiZP9GqOWV0owFJGHRcZWVg7A4cOTLinAVM0tsUa BI6oUWQw99gA1Cent0RB9aiGMjzgRs+M4Hjlk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YCCzaYrCdWFQoGVkU8uHm8VH2C+Fd+Fd2fgXlxsRSzdof7jgll6LftvKdwwTf+DBJh ciwBb1nuDZh/w4UB1TQaD/VJ42Az2NE779TYwuyUhcIU8Caod6i+dJULdeTLA8PFtOuu w/z7Y9k1yaN9xSC/9tsM0Y8TwbXE5JGLw+qzg=
>Maybe something similar can be done for other things as
> well. Like I've always wanted to create a simple GTK IRC client that
> just works. Maybe I should create it for SliTaz to replace the terrible
> lostirc.
maybe yad frontends for
https://github.com/halhen/shic
http://alge.anart.no/linux/scripts/bairc-1.3.bash
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Brenton Edgar Scott
<trixarian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:30:03 -0700
> Indigo <pointofavailability@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Whatever the case, the KISS philosophy should be as much about
>> usability as it is development. I'm one of the many users who wants a
>> small, lightweight distro that works OOTB and has the basic features
>> Slitaz already includes.
>
> I agree, SliTaz is probably as small as it can get without a major
> overhaul. Using uclibc might work, but it will require recompiling
> everything over into it to benefit from the smaller binaries it may
> produce.
>
> Using compiled programs will only help as much as being able to cut out
> the dialog programs like gtkdialog. It's not a really big space saver,
> but the speed will be a noticeable.
>
> Ultimately, we should keep going back to the KISS philosophy like you
> said. Just look at the route pankso took with the creation of TazWeb
> and Tazpanel. We needed simpler and lighter solutions for both, so he
> created them. Maybe something similar can be done for other things as
> well. Like I've always wanted to create a simple GTK IRC client that
> just works. Maybe I should create it for SliTaz to replace the terrible
> lostirc.
>
> ---
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
>
--
Thanx and regd's.
Allan.
http://www.in2dwok.com
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/