Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More vhffs.org/vhffs Archives ]

To: vhffs@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS
From: Laurent Stella <olaulau@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 22:41:23 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qquLeKV7I4NoaFHtEGHQqATqLPkCUB3XGzaE6SKgBk8=; b=ID1bhVTpyq01WgUpbvD0HGoelDOcUFtxD3+dPSbi/p0lgWfWizdKty13h5bCb/PhRg /oLmQ8jZeTWhL4js7noryCWHcNniphvoue0NVkjv4n4AjxL7GJmvNHl7JN7Ut+lhxl8+ TzIYFaljSfnut9cwZr0hmEn82imNe6c5NlFOPu8Z4btPXxiabknmIxf6p5XhD01SzTXd gtzdQDQhFZ+ibFDDc3bFnFyFKuQNWwYKjy9T2HbUnC8YOr1cbOpqdKKxmy7n5U+logeh fmBHVqODDKZ8gO02ElLeUrpj8UmwhQ7mVcpU+BT+6z79IGZzVjw3lXwlz5RO2UDOZsPb IfRw==

si la connexion est directe, sans reverse proxy, pas d'en-tête ajoutée.
dans ce cas là, RPAF fait des choses étranges.

Le 10/04/2016 22:19, Yann Verry a écrit :

On 06/04/2016 18:43, Sylvain Rochet wrote:

Tiens je savais pas qu'rpaf savait faire ça, mais ça manque quand même
d'une condition sur un header transmis par le proxy, un truc genre
X-From-HTTPS: Yes/No

X-Forwarded-Proto (http ou https en valeur) est fait pour ce genre de chose

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS
  - From: Sylvain Rochet

References:
- Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS
  - From: Laurent Stella
- Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS
  - From: Sylvain Rochet
- Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS
  - From: Laurent Stella
- Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS
  - From: Sylvain Rochet
- Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS
  - From: Yann Verry

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS
Next by Date: Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS
Previous by thread: Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS
Next by thread: Re: [vhffs] support HTTPS

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/