[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Any arch support
- From: Brenton Edgar Scott <trixarian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:52:06 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GQQKwYuOomIzDGUNNyT0cBHOWxlvsGd9L9Ns6TTfOU0=; b=I0yEX8SG629WLNa5v8mwzYCFNWzYWKPoROtuFD3dXStta9qQeDxHJ4A3BCcY/K6oTQ SLgaaA/maPzbCkOE1OrTmih4ZmUFO2FSHnlrCbd3hJVuLPCfTEraxps/u7Q5cuvuV/yj 0Z9MN10uW4pPXePYMY6U93apRlE/bgb4dxFoVen0xVxhF20pjdSxur/MEiFkRWAhJc0u bGLoS4bhJcUu2LJRBvQjig/FZww5d4Vrp3f2Uu7oP/ZREUnuguokBsb0KxJpTnY4Eipk bBgdCi/ADWcB44vyExLd/GOTd26LFWlHodK1cGyLxhQGOLHgipP3BezlniUBgMfYx2Q7 ebxQ==
On Mon, 14 May 2012 07:13:19 +0000
Christopher Rogers <slaxemulator@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think we are going to need any arch support just like archlinux
> has. This is so we can save disk space on source dvd and server. It
> will have do like subfolders like any and then $ARCH folder. The idea
> is to use softlinks from any folder and put then in $ARCH. So
> packages folder will be more like this:
> packages/$ARCH
> packages/any
>
> This way we don't need a cookutils-2.0.tazpkg and
> cookutils-2.0-arm.tazpkg since cookutils should work just fine as one
> package on both systems. This will also be helpful for perl, python,
> and docs packages.
>
> This is cause a idea for now. We will have to see if it can be done
> without breaking everything.
>
> PS We need to add a way to rebuild packages database without wok. I
> have this in my-cookutils. This is just to make it simple to make
> package database.
The trouble with this will be that we have to rewrite the whole
structure of the packages. Also the packages will grow in size if we
include the compiled binaries (and libraries) for EVERY Arch type.
--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/