[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 4.0 will now load
- From: Terry Maiden <t.maiden@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1334780844; bh=Q2winGXZHzv8dKz2pGnC4+B7O+IZ2gbn8rShMCpmNnQ=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RS52ogEGfsFfCGItoOzw4d1FNDQ0yt4e/65Se9Ysw8DkRAVTz68Ighgn6La+ERui5oPZDNyhzR0aK76JgYr9Wup6P+oRJmw1oAmnkL53NUIu0SEqn20jTrl7SXSVzLQZ+2PhLfj/yOdozTX/i06DgVaKls1/1Xbw4QgbgL1FusE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=att.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4fPN4Wnn69q4U276dWljPU3BC0MNLIG9MNVAd+NS/t/71OhdwP13ljosCZ433iAaGNajioAu3eSQcqfk88zv5+LzNLkesHI+FtdE4xzvhqGvTNlxqLMHGXWD9YhF2hm0+Yq+biQWWNXYOu4/pirjJX13amDMmF5CHNDdy/DX7FU=;
Decided to try a different QEMU. QEMU-0.13.0 seems to run Slitaz 4.0 better than QEMU-0.9.0 with the accelerator turned off does. I have other Linux software that runs better with QEMU-0.9.0 + accelerator. Its older though.. The problem with Xorg remains. No matter what I try I can only get 800x600. This is very annoying. Also either Midori or Yahoo Mail is pushing the CPU to 100%. This is the virtual CPU I guess.
--- On Wed, 4/18/12, Terry Maiden <t.maiden@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Terry Maiden <t.maiden@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: 4.0 will now load
> To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 2:38 PM
> (I am using 4.0 right now. The Midori
> browser was able to access AOL Mail and Yahoo Mail just
> fine.)
>
> I was able to get 4.0 to load and run by turning off the
> Kqemu accelerator. It makes using 4.0 very slow
> however to run it this way. Another problem has come
> up though. I would prefer to set the VGA=791, meaning a
> 1024x768 screen. Xorg is still defaulting to 800x600
> and I can't seem to get it to change its mind. I have
> had this same problem with Xorg going back to Slitaz
> 2.0. I would prefer to use Xvesa because if you tell
> it you want 1024x768 Xvesa gives you that. Its
> possible that this Toshiba laptop has a video card your Xorg
> can't deal with.
>
>
> --- On Wed, 4/18/12, Christophe Lincoln <pankso@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Christophe Lincoln <pankso@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: 4.0 will not load
> > To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 2:20 AM
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > OK I tried what you suggested. The same thing
> occured
> > which is the
> > > same thing that has occured with every cooking for
> 4.0
> > going back to
> > > the beginning. The linux load proceeds to about
> the
> > halfway point
> > > and then what looks like a memory dump occurs.
> A
> > listing of what
> > > appears to be memory addresses and their contents.
> It
> > then freezes
> > > and that's it. I have brought this up several
> times
> > previously but
> > > noone seems to have a clue as to what the problem
> > is. I have gotten
> > > the impression that a Windows QEMU user is not
> part of
> > the "Club" and
> > > doesn't get much help.
> >
> > Maybe we dont have so much user and contributors using
> > Windows,
> > personnaly last time I used MS was 3-4 years ago so I
> can't
> > help. The
> > only thing I see is go head 4.0 and try our new glibc
> and
> > kernel 3.2.14.
> >
> > I'm uploading an ISO at the moment (more in next mail)
> >
> > - Christophe
> >
> > --
> > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >
> >
>
> --
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
>
--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/