[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Midori web browser
- From: Terry Maiden <t.maiden@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:50:22 -0800 (PST)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1297273824; bh=zgSH1TpQW+ee5HSeaNILM9mm09BXAyabHLet+/iRAY8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=3A/LGDmv3UUq8f5d/SiudA/TybhdJMc9gh0ki2m2arT4sfVnNQe86TEKIpMFn7NgOSpH56kPYW8LqkP1i9xSBxgveifum7AT9s5RlHJiSYQ7SaHiWKjtZIw4GOREh/VuJlqsSPeACaXASF6quUld+0fOU6hxD8GjksJhTna3gJY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=att.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yJuiuQnTTciW8r6ppx1BMlb7uwu61AObuaediXWbg3ASmQWrJc6iY/wNw2H5ZzQ8qz0gt3o+e8qZWl6zVkzWyXLKAQD2QylzJGhd8/lYmI0yqYoo6qWEzOhAIiWeLNJ2gBgMNCETkM/ZoJ6B2fMscTS7fbt0kSf9ls0VnteWlBk=;
The size of Midori vs "any other" browser is meaningless if Midori doesn't work right. Midori as implemented in 3.0 doesn't work right.
--- On Wed, 2/9/11, Dennis Hodapp <thehodapp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Dennis Hodapp <thehodapp@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Midori web browser
To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 2:00 AM
Midori is still nearly 10 times smaller than Seamonky which is around 30MB :/
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Terry Maiden <t.maiden@xxxxxxx> wrote:
How about Seamonkey? Would it make a good substitute for Midori or Firefox?
--- On Wed, 2/9/11, Allan Pinto <allan316@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Allan Pinto <allan316@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Midori web browser
> To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 12:09 AM
> i had made a slitaz live cd (2.0
> based i think ) with qt and Arora and
> GNS3 and python came to 35 mb ( no firefox), it was a
> long time back
> and i dont remember much what i added and did not. but if
> any else is
> interested in checking out the pkglist your welcome.
> http://www.in2dwok.com/downloads/dynatazgns.iso,
> if i remember correctly Arora could not open gmail or any
> ssl based
> sites, must have changed by now.
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Fred J. Stephens <fjs205@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Dennis Hodapp <thehodapp@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >> Would konqueror not work? Or Arora? Both are very
> good browsers.
> > Konqueror would huge QT libs. Aurora is also QT based
> I think. Would
> > add too much size to Slitaz probably.
> >
> > ---
> > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanx and regd's.
>
> Allan.
> http://www.in2dwok.com
>
> ---
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
>
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/