Re: slitaz, alpine, uclibc and others

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]


The ISO is 193 megs, and according to the second link posted, it's not
much different from a minimal installation of arch or debian.  Slitaz
is still where it's at for portability...

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rohit Joshi <rj.rohit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Interesting. BTW, we do have a Slitaz uClibc toolchain (not from sources
> though) http://hg.slitaz.org/wok/rev/8da46cc14f57 . Some preliminary work
> for ARM port uses it: http://labs.slitaz.org/wiki/arm
>
> Rohit
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Alexander Medvedev <devl547@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Have anyone tried Alpine Linux (http://www.alpinelinux.org/)? I used it
>> for about a week and found it a real competitor to slitaz.
>> Its killer-feature is uClibc - it decreases ram and hdd usage a lot. XFCE
>> desktop in 39 Mb? Not a problem for it
>> (http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/12/02/also-not-a-joke-xfce-on-39mb/)
>> So I have two questions - anyone interested in uClibc spin or fork?
>> And how to build new slitaz toolchain?
>> With best regards, Alexander.
>
>

---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/