| Re: slitaz, alpine, uclibc and others |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: slitaz, alpine, uclibc and others
- From: Alexander Medvedev <devl547@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 10:51:40 +0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=M18MLWpAOm0ab6xfZXH/LQKF3hlzvfGE13L3eME84UM=; b=S2TceClhF9l5SP3slDHPHZzNyNhfF4enGeiLhiCe5hBVOxL6OjmYiBzlHi5UCa1ahm IZwNLIFWm5+lLFpk0iRpy1jCUfLaLyYdp6y6svfeeEizrNQ/XF4nJA5x1dKkkt1Y6kzX kJWA4cefnzc4TKoadZJg53ZqO7j+x69MNB4AM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=yEBGESFJ3nPUeJHzfymwTFI/USTmjIIQUI2CI3lDHJ4dP1INyS3co/yVui0AvnmtNc f8YM5+l/eT+51PZNZbA+3snmLrbUG6pN+/tC1PJuAGRG9wfAx4IXgIosKz7N47V4uRSB J5t44HDiWEcNhQu5YBcEObKHaL9fldFFwT+AQ=
>The ISO is 193 megs
Afaik, it doesnt use any kind of compression at cdrom like slitaz.
>Slitaz is still where it's at for portability...
First we talked about size, then about performance. Now about portability. Maybe we need a clear goal for SliTaz?