Re: XFS

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]


amen !

_____________________________________________________________
|XFS? Yes please.
|
|"Personally, I still choose XFS for filesystem performance and
|scalability"
|http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388
|
|Settings to optimize an XFS file system
|http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1314920,00.html
|
|Comparaison des systèmes de fichier ReiserFS, Ext3, Jfs et Xfs
|http://arnofear.free.fr/linux/files/contrib/bench/bench.html
|
|"XFS does have unique advantages:
|(1) Very nice handling of large files, as mentioned before. If you work
|with 200+MB sized files regularly, XFS is your filesystem!
|(2) Only filesystem with online repacker. XFS has a command xfs_fsr for
|?defragging? online filesystems. This can be helpful with slowly
|torrented or other large files that can become fragmented enough to
|impact performance.
|(3) Only filesystem with online dump tool: xfsdump is awesome for
|backups and that alone is why I choose it personally."
|http://pthree.org/2008/04/23/xfs-vs-reiser/
|
|XFS FAQ
|http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#xfsinfo
|
|cooltaz
|
|-- 
|http://www.fastmail.fm
|
|
|---
|SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list.
|Web site : http://www.slitaz.org/

---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list.
Web site : http://www.slitaz.org/


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/