[ Thread Index |
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/sawfish Archives
- To: sawfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Sawfish] GitHub?
- From: dmg <dmg@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:28:36 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Ae4oZgGIkcXlVsOGNgpDeAxSqhiuFAHHpHonqGy7ASY=; b=SZTvs6BNiDwCbpe3Swu+h04anHfYBkt9plZhraFyr7/dbN9bzqwdll9fBLbnaz+/Ra mrugRMX2cBbAdUdQ16U3wtiPZxpwcdcm2GdARkN304XLGWbh9U+jkDWyX5i4yJe8BW0Z BF1PgX6BfajXlCv88QsCuZt0Rcw8zU7jhueg/JGBAQ+S454n19bxh8aYKM9pP0NXmcDG N0eWmdgRFQCO0DabAiDLIq5DP1Nb0yYRSJ9qox/iHdPshE+mNt0iyGiyfkomVFGBZxkg ucO8TK5RKXEvPUecTNWAl5xcnaoMZUpXGQ0UTePnBORFiGQkU1BuCH9OkeK2LKKW31ie yfiQ==
Hi Chris and everybody,
Having observer github for a while, I think that the great advantage
of it is the process it creates around git.
It makes easy to track patches via a code review mechanism created
around pull requests.
In theory there is no need to move the "blessed" repo to github, just
create a fork there that we all use for development.
Chris, you could even add some of us (as required) as committers to
this repo. Once code is approved we can push it into
tuxfamily. Of course tuxfamily would not be required.
So in conclusion, I vote for github.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Christopher Roy Bratusek
> Hi all,
> some people said, they would prefer GitHub over Tuxfamily.
> What do you think about it? Since GitHub does not provide mailing-list
> facilities, we wouldn't completely leave Tuxfamily.
Daniel M. German