| [qet] Linux installation directories |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/qet Archives
]
- To: qet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [qet] Linux installation directories
- From: Simon Dop <dop.simon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 19:01:11 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=M+7RU3eEKM/MeJX3qojxhLaQN5S5TGJSVCGjLsSMIkA=; b=MSIWPItds043f3CSu39n61XyKtpCiGU5agQy8VdcO587FeFFlM4HSHfhIneeKuVwza 70pRdngeRPjhwDOKYqfBzE4bW//n5PnU8s8IfOiTvYRHHsk3gPbrLg8Hew90mVj4/7WF PIig5qfL2gZ0ryJgFlawY0AVMaGjPs5vfVEdmJuSZhMLPSfLSG/u5FTkpTG1E6whhlpd GjV3+C/HfpqeQmJKClXqEUIzHsLM8Oy+VdLIL9caEHeJyXMwfSIFUT3pPo1p6MMYRhsr PZa+AffShLPwpkSvO622CsatEbCveM/hFC6aLWtQdw3ntjWWQ9snsEjQNPrVGlawO6Bx RyNA==
Hi,
I do maintain the PKGBUILD for qelectrotech in ArchLinux (see [1]).
I noticed some time ago that the installation directories for Qelectrotech
are not FHS-compliant (see [2]). For now, I do patch the qelectrotech.pro
to be FHS compliant (see [3]).
Is there a reason behind this ?
If there is no reason, could you fix this ?
Thanks in advance for your answer
--
Simon Doppler <dop.simon@xxxxxxxxx>
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qelectrotech/
[2] http://codepad.org/zewnMNa0
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/install-dir.patch?h=qelectrotech