| Re: [proaudio] patch for lmms-9999-r1 (new branch by upstream) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] patch for lmms-9999-r1 (new branch by upstream)
- From: Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:52:24 +0100
- Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEXy8ubtkoXo7+b1+fbN cGKCeWDtamweFA8eMkmKPkPtvcWRoqyV0Pn7AAACbElEQVQ4jXXTMWvbQBQA4MOlizsdXEXp KAi09mKcLZ0EJxONDRJVkikg9AtqTm63gtHDmVJs1GsnC0JiaTMJGN2f67uzznJb+gZj9PFO 7717IqdtvCAmem4bxMLp/2BEyEBF1+U/0H8uhI6rv+BVLNrY/gH9T0L8yAxk2yMY3YuZxDCn TY/gpBByyTGktIcZOIvFjPNJmqYJDwrx3cIoBrE0zzG4FF8tfBAwM+DonKCYWjgROZ6Upjcm 5Qje58JAmlKKGfIAjzaDUuogZBY2Bjg14eDbywMIqZvwqgqFBcVFB0seYONLb00ZZlh4p0F6 FHNoUMyKAzxowJSQTyj+XloYs3MN3GeMpzyYSTMshLM00ODpWlPp4SDbqs4cViDcGAgmlK/a PsaOg7DvIQ3wzANMqB/iQW/XTkoTLO6XhSeHUoQKe+NLjyY/Ldx7CW2D4WTYhZ3V0GP64RpP Q/E66IUWMLj3+nDn4w2ejMACyXFeHZy6ETcZehc49bv1GQ/0bazNuzm97mDkhnoie9i30WYM w/YCnYT7Fx308s98n0IT//Jod1+aOzdzYXLVbftol+PC+REG3u+0AxdEtuSMB6G+DLGwMH4E vXGmJn8VCLM9LhmrOAMQYt5Wi/DFgIC52iFkUzMpDVmjAaDZRGC+JGwDqzJ/G5fUUcWZAaE7 YfvPLYtIU1Wb4A2IeS7uDMgcIFutiCr766qGfKHyuxvTIERKXVNSN27lDgCuBuojlpxIyJV6 ritS1uWWuHF2Ww7qcIKbqEFVNbmtmm3vGSCHbVXjikrY3SpVxwQWw2aIjwG+ueXTJDmHeK6a HfwGyU5ZSlGeSRQAAAAASUVORK5CYII=
Le Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:02:15 +0100,
"Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" <fordfrog@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> there was no master branch before ... or i was blind. i recall there
> was only old-master, stable-0.4, and when lmms-1.0 was release they
> created stable-1.0. anyway, with master branch there the ebuild should
> definitely use master branch :-)
According to http://lmms.sourceforge.net/download.php it is
git clone https://github.com/LMMS/lmms.git
We can just reverse the last commit.
Cheers,
Dominique
>
> m.
>
> Dne 24.3.2014 21:54, Matt Henley napsal(a):
> > I thought -9999 is using for development versions. Based on their
> > mailing list, it looks like stable-1.0 is for backporting fixes and
> > "master" is used for new development. What is your intention with
> > this ebuild?
> >
> > Mailing list email:
> >
> > *Re: [LMMS-devel] Any critical issue left?
> > <http://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/32139347/>*
> > From: Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerffel@gm...> - 2014-03-24 18:42:12
> > Hi,
> >
> > I agree on the proposed branching model and pushed everything
> > accordingly.
> >
> > Important note for all users: if you compile LMMS from Git, please
> > switch to the stable-1.0 branch:
> >
> > git checkout -b stable-1.0 origin/stable-1.0
> >
> > Then you can do "git pull" from time to time. If you want unstable
> > stuff which is going to be included in 1.1 (Q2/2014) checkout the
> > master branch instead.
> >
> > Toby
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:54 AM, "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)"
> > <fordfrog@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:fordfrog@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > with lmms 1.0 release upstream created new branch so it's
> > needed to update branch in the ebuild aswell.
> >
> > m.
> >
> >
>