Re: [proaudio] RT-sources availability

[Cinder <cinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

--- arve.barsnes@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

From: Arve Barsnes <arve.barsnes@xxxxxxxxx>
To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [proaudio] RT-sources availability
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:30:41 +0200

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Cinder <cinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> --- arve.barsnes@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> From: Arve Barsnes <arve.barsnes@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [proaudio] RT-sources availability
> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:13:46 +0200
>
>>>  exactly, no RT sources in the main portage tree, just the pro-audio
>>> overlay.  i believe there is a more recent rt-sources ebuild available, you
>>> just have to unmask it.  the latest unstable version is 2.6.29.6-rt23, which
>>> works fine, unless you are using the new xorg-server-1.6 and the new video
>>> drivers.  hoping to find/make/etc. a new rt-sources soon based on the new
>>> 2.6.31.4-rt.
>
>>Running 2.6.31.2-rt13 here now, with a patched version of
>>nvidia-drivers, seems to work ok, although I haven't used it for much
>>serious yet, what particular problems are you refering to here?
>
> Re. "the latest unstable version is 2.6.29.6-rt23, which
> works fine, unless you are using the new xorg-server-1.6 and the new video
> drivers."
>
>  ... I'm using xorg-server-1.6.3.901-r2 and radeon xorg-drivers-1.6 with
> Gentoo-2.6.30-r6 wich is working well. Are thier forseeable  problems with
> RT-2.6.29.6-rt23 and X 1.6?

Probably nothing wrong with the .29 versions, but I had to patch my
nvidia-drivers to to use .31 kernel, since some realtime syntax
changed or something like that. There was a fairly detailed discussion
on the nvidia forums, and it was talked about on LUA too.


O.K. I'm using ATI, so I'll just jump in and see happens. Thanx.






_____________________________________________________________
Get your FREE, LinuxWaves.com Email Now! --> http://www.LinuxWaves.com
Join Linux Discussions! --> http://Community.LinuxWaves.com