| Re: [proaudio] ardour 3.9999 convert to waf?? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] ardour 3.9999 convert to waf??
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 06:26:27 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=leCga6gCv1HSj4ltomE+qiYcdhp55pBKTiEXf/YdKFo=; b=et9BAd3QesCpBi26C5CxAnIrLFd788y04u6Q//4XuyqQ4Iz6OPAbEhonD6pVtTH/jt 8dfpuZA974wX30OAEoh5NbhJusOkS+9XGZl0xkxnR1Z/LrMGG5aJ3aKRLExdQnYp+08U AT96cjFt6vVI7ypppkIjpCqIzwJiRcFc4lOXs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aj4B1GsSvb0UwUTA88kyGez4Q3obpxuObiEmxTLg/BQsW7uih/J0GUei9LLTIlmWbe z/XTQpBIUXq2cUIrTzvdRZXaJWUkXMik7ygFMkr9ouWzt3/ko3jMtOw5axA+Aqy+TWdL ZKeGGAntMzswjO4YEQg44886MuqcC13oSmJsE=
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:35 AM, allan <sonofzev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Folks
>
> I know this is probably a big job but is it possible for ardour 3.9999
> to be converted to use waf to compile instead of scons.. It appears that
> waf is the preferential way and scons is becoming deprecated.
>
> I have been unable to compile from the ebuild for the last few versions
> but have successfully built it using the waf method.
>
> Regards
>
> Allan
I suspect that this question is best posed to Paul Davis. The ebuild
just implements under portage whatever the project uses, so this is a
project question, not a Gentoo question.
Ask on Ardour-dev or Ardour-users or write Paul directly. He's very
accessible and has a lot of insight into the use of Linux development
tools.
- Mark