Re: [proaudio] Wrong eclasses in some ebuilds |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Wrong eclasses in some ebuilds
- From: Gavin Pryke <gavinlee303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:17:34 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=xhq5+usmU47fb36QUEmTsXvIjwnE+xYUuDu3TWIRy4A=; b=jLNuMIm5gZCEtmI37k4VXXy0IHwmez0zs0xopGyWEEt3G47h1tkA266cMdYBGYW+Pl 68OLk2ANdvQLhlYclG5TahTmxN55Tv5Uppt1i09iQj0iSqzTlH2V9Z6PsaBsxpXc3+X2 wQVYnsKhzVAOTf1Y/RErWhpL16T6//pWQdq6o=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=kr15yAMRW9TNTN1pivJx7DKXpG3JY0byQE068/us+dapNeL8K/qNyqHWEIXymstizV UUn2jIRqIEH5wX+6FVR/BFFGfec6wE0OCa0koAjMLVsAJ245R2pYOKT/WvJKafWgwWgw BV4SNseeOQKiOxCrR4N5ecSNBbDrSmoRiluF4=
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 19:52:07 Dominique Michel wrote:
> /usr/portage/local/layman/test/
Are all these ebuilds in an overlay on top of proaudio? It looks like the
ebuilds are trying to use an eclass that doesn't exist, seems a lot of people
having this problem with ebuilds. I'm not sure how portage handles eclass in
stacked overlays. Maybe try a look in /usr/portage/local/layman/test/eclass
to see if the eclasses are there, if not try copying them from the proaudio
overlay. Just a few thoughts.
Best regards,
Gav