Re: [proaudio] 2.6.26 series of kernels

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]


I found this http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235647

Have now added Device Drivers->Real Time Clock->PC-style 'CMOS'
compiled into the kernel. Will try this new kernel build next time I
have a chance to reboot.

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:42 PM, carmen r <_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu Sep 11, 2008 at 07:31:27PM +0200, Arve Barsnes wrote:
>> dmesg gives this:
>>
>> drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
>>
>> Although this is on the working kernel 2.6.25.8-rt7, could it have
>> something to do with it? Or maybe it's an unrelated problem. Would
>> probably be niced to get fixed anyway.
>
> maybe its working in vanilla dev branch (ingos stuff always unstable/broken for me for years)
>
> see http://lwn.net/Articles/289013/
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:06 AM, sonofzev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <sonofzev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I think this is a configuration thing..
>> >
>> > I have the same issue on some of my boxes.. some of which are still on the
>> > 2.6.24 series kernel...
>> >
>> > If anyone knows which option needs to be checked or unchecked.. please mail
>> > it to the post.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu Sep 11 16:54 , "Arve Barsnes" sent:
>> >
>> > Is the .26-series working fine for any of you guys? I registered the
>> > problems people had with -rt1, where it would just crash, and I tried
>> > out 2.6.26.3-rt7 a few days ago, and experienced the same. It is
>> > probably a configuration problem, but I don't see what's the big
>> > difference between my running .25 -rt7 kernel and the new one. Anyone
>> > know what could be the cause?
>> >
>> > I managed to get some error message when I shut down the computer
>> > again before it managed to crash, something about not being able to
>> > access the hardware clock, and I reckon something like that would be
>> > pretty fatal to realtime operations, but I never used any realtime
>> > applications with .26 before it crashed on me, so I'm guessing the
>> > clock is important all around? Anyway, that's the only thing I can
>> > think of that was "wrong" while running the new kernel.
>> >
>> > )
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/