Re: [proaudio] 2.6.26 series of kernels |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] 2.6.26 series of kernels
- From: "Arve Barsnes" <arve.barsnes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:31:27 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=E7UOzqtUlixyiTWxDt635f5fLhqdveRmok62LkKXdtg=; b=TonWKZtXxVg+0xGv31ULZ8943Rqn+gGOeUQ6e9anI6PGQFkuVBIfXL5zDPgHWjCZ5j GA/Unk6GCAUJKQwGwHzwzztcJ5kSU1Ang+a82l2o/AIfaoBo2YbrKF5W5+n9UMjoY/WM sz99LBp3oBgeLe9hhZsFCuLv6ZDILs98+LJo4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ph233+Jgs6hdyp7nMv/IQOzsBjG2bUVjQNOVJXcN0ivnePQ8KkMHRXkfBVgxldJNpE oCCGPNvA/KCZE3+tj6S4TZmKXmPMgasM6tYm087eOyryyOXSk+1P3BLTlwar1Uxavu7i PFI/WDgM5z1he6Shr3Dho51sSs7V/WFsBMiTI=
dmesg gives this:
drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
Although this is on the working kernel 2.6.25.8-rt7, could it have
something to do with it? Or maybe it's an unrelated problem. Would
probably be niced to get fixed anyway.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:06 AM, sonofzev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<sonofzev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think this is a configuration thing..
>
> I have the same issue on some of my boxes.. some of which are still on the
> 2.6.24 series kernel...
>
> If anyone knows which option needs to be checked or unchecked.. please mail
> it to the post.
>
>
>
> On Thu Sep 11 16:54 , "Arve Barsnes" sent:
>
> Is the .26-series working fine for any of you guys? I registered the
> problems people had with -rt1, where it would just crash, and I tried
> out 2.6.26.3-rt7 a few days ago, and experienced the same. It is
> probably a configuration problem, but I don't see what's the big
> difference between my running .25 -rt7 kernel and the new one. Anyone
> know what could be the cause?
>
> I managed to get some error message when I shut down the computer
> again before it managed to crash, something about not being able to
> access the hardware clock, and I reckon something like that would be
> pretty fatal to realtime operations, but I never used any realtime
> applications with .26 before it crashed on me, so I'm guessing the
> clock is important all around? Anyway, that's the only thing I can
> think of that was "wrong" while running the new kernel.
>
> )
>
>