[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [proaudio] jackdmp
- From: "Arve Barsnes" <arve.barsnes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:25:29 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=CnU9Qf+FC7cdB5NAP8gDicbilm8DocwAcTIFG63LZZQ=; b=cH8Gtj3oJBnwRkOF0qa1jtUcH6KSwkdvZcq3762INutdIBd7fF7HANwwBkJGv9jMf+ uKQQLJoKl1hIu510u0A2y8aLKIlHoUafmAi4OHFXLW65XF1nGVDoIpf2MTMK10fIQ7u8 kKa+5sEnhr4TriRCNv6PmekPhtABHiLu4zA9U=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=S4jHAPXu8pQgmdOF7kjVgvNdPA7GYSZOMZ2J7AhTm+B/ymwOcayvX6JVxkTTCJL8RN Dg2JQ08eVghL3M84RCIISPZd1p90e6VPU6lhlBZU2a97TC4BShxoP1Mj8SOmQ5mLCL1r HjBaJcx6DU7zmcKTXu+s8Tm+REPq+V2OsryCI=
Is it recommended to run jackdmp on any multiprocessor machine? I have
a quad core, so am naturally interested, but the package doesn't have
any keywording so it seems natural that it's not very well tested. Is
it stable enough to use?