Re: [proaudio] Ardour2 maintenance branch

[rob <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Frieder Bürzele wrote:
> rob wrote:
> > Not sure if you know this, but Ardour-2.x.x bugfixes (at least some 
> > of them) are being applied to both the trunk and a maintenance 
> > branch.  The ardour-99992
> > ebuild assumes trunk, and there may be some nasty bugs on trunk while 
> > Paul
> > and company forge ahead.
> maybe we could call it something like
> ardour-2.0.9999
> but this will give the impression that it's something like a pre 
> version of 2.1
How about make 99992 be the maintenance branch (marked unstable), and 
99993 be trunk (missing keyword)?

R