| Re: [proaudio] ardour2 problems |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] ardour2 problems
- From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 06:19:51 -0700
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nrMbOPq9yAaNhX+RoH1ILW7ibl89G3rEBHXKcrHkavqN+8E0lxuNTle7YcLfaUnrzmQ1mzabJfzncjBCagZ7YCSMBArzm7oq/a+vLDGqLD0Z7X2dtHBUd7yEIlCoZlRqGXBjKIrtCh61F9QRqC4AP6+hYSWzQZAD5pY3PY8Nttc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IaZUk3dYhdFjAsBsKi/moPRzfxc1C4vsM+n0irKr04glR6Ql6LPCnMKN96fBwVtwps35eWfsX/hNdx5h9XblDxdBQbKR/ocU2G+w3zIqxyy1ygdkmn0Oe10ziu1/SJgQ7J1BzQ4wLXCSdcZ9Xn4EbPpobWt9WHmWYjwZNVYbI2I=
On 5/2/07, Frieder Bürzele <evermind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
<SNIP>
>
> Emerging -99992 now. Very strange!
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Mark
>
Hi,
As the package name ardour2 is incorrect I moved the ebuild ardour2-9999
(svn)
to ardour-99992 (svn).
ardour-0.99 and ardour-99991 (svn) refer to ardour-0.99xx
both "ardour series" could be installed parallel
btw. ardour-2.0 is released and in the overlay
Greetz Frieder
Thanks all. I went with 99992 which built Ardour 2.1 pre from CVS. It
built fine and runs fine as far as I can tell. (AMD64, 2.6.21-rc5-rt12
here)
cheers,
Mark