Re: [proaudio] ardour2 problems

[Frieder Bürzele <evermind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 5/1/07, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Di, 01.05.07 14:09 "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > This looks suspect:
> > >
> > >  Instead try emerge =ardour-99992 please
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mark
> >
> > Looks indeed ugly, but ardour2 ebuikds are deprecated.
> > Please do as the ebuild says.
> >
> > Best,
> > Tom
>
> Hi Tom,
>   OK, so I guess I didn't look carefully enough at everything eix was
> telling me?
>
> lightning ~ # eix ardour
> * media-sound/ardour
>     Available versions:
>        (0)     ~0.99.2 ~0.99.2[1] ~0.99.3 ~0.99.3[1] **99991[1]
>        (1)     ~*2.0_rc2[1] ~*2.0[1] **99992[1]
>        {altivec debug nls sse vst}
>     Homepage:            http://ardour.org/
>     Description:         multi-track hard disk recording software
>
> * media-sound/ardour2 [1]
>     Available versions:  (~*)2.0_rc1 (**)9999 {altivec debug nls sse vst}
>     Homepage:            http://ardour.org/
>     Description:         multi-track hard disk recording software
>
> [1] /usr/portage/local/layman/pro-audio
>
> Found 2 matches.
> lightning ~ #
>
> Are you suggesting that I'm supposed to emerge 'ardour' and not 
> 'ardour2'?
>
> Looking at the revisions I suppose that ardour-99991 is ardour from
> CVS while ardour-99992 is ardour2 from CVS? If so I find that
> confusing.
>
> Emerging -99992 now. Very strange!
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Mark

Hi,

As the package name ardour2 is incorrect I moved the ebuild ardour2-9999 
(svn)
to ardour-99992 (svn).

ardour-0.99 and ardour-99991 (svn) refer to ardour-0.99xx
both "ardour series" could be installed parallel

btw. ardour-2.0 is released and in the overlay



Greetz Frieder