| Re: [proaudio] mammut - is the ebuild possibly missing ~amd64 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
On Sa, 17.02.07 14:07 "Kjetil S. Matheussen"
<k.s.matheussen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Thomas Kuther wrote:
>
> > On Sa, 17.02.07 13:49 "Kjetil S. Matheussen"
> > <k.s.matheussen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Thomas Kuther wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fr, 16.02.07 17:24 "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Title says it all. I couldn't get it to build.
> >>>>
> >>>> Not important to me at all. Just making a report.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Mark
> >>>
> >>> 0.22? That's totally outdated.
> >>
> >> Thats an exaggeration. 0.22 was released in july 2006 I think. :-)
> >>
> >>
> >>> I just commited 0.57 - but with still broken Makefile!
> >>> So it won't compile yet.
> >>>
> >>
> >> If its just make install that is the problem, you shouldn't use
> >> that one anyway. Just "dobin src/mammut" and "dodoc
> >> doc/mammut.html" or something.
> >
> > Heya Kjetil!
> >
> > Yes, fixed. Good practice playing around with Makefiles.
> > Very cool app!
> >
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> > Still need to find a way how we could get make.conf's C/CXXFLAGS in
> > there, do you know how?
> >
>
> I'm not sure whats the best way. Perhaps changing
>
> CFLAGS= ...
> into
> CFLAGS+= ...
>
> and
>
> CXXFLAGS= ...
> into
> CXXFLAGS+= ...
>
> is enough.
>
>
Wow, that was easy. Thanks.
So, ebuild now uses system C/CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS.