| Re: [proaudio] puredata... any desire? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] puredata... any desire?
- From: Brian Dunn <job17and9@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 13:05:52 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4HzZ7h8SX2CsugRdZUXlq+yxZh0bY5vDe/jXgVF4yqw1YbtrafsGSpXaKGspl2eTIHCzJsl+qwb5w8/Q9VwhFKh8XfgIhhvyj1Wcqmkq1iluqogo+Y2Fa+g57ZX5LeRlgy9qf2N+8Dt0ik5T0j05G8iXTeypmOrtS9gPWItGPFg= ;
we are wrote:
> woops
>
>
> just wondering if there is a pure-data desire data (CVS)ebuild in the
> proaudio overlay.
> furhtermore is there much pd interest in this overlay at all? is there
> potential for pdp, Gem etc?
>
> cheers
>
>
I'd look at 'em. pd is neato.