| Re: [proaudio] swh-plugins/gcc-4.1.1 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] swh-plugins/gcc-4.1.1
- From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:06:35 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IZpG6IgLDdsoW5154nyhvZFb0IGDHzkxb45za7sfIRK0B896rc6Ce8GT+caZYQaNC0ARKcbrAwRkYwPmKt7QBfpAiecuF6dBmue0T6ebQveuNyK4kyZtG14On1P1Q78XFJQ2CibwrC5gU1Ohmh6nns51BY9AMPPrx3qqfuTYpTk=
On 9/11/06, carmen <_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 11:05:29AM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 07:56:05AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is swh-plugins known to compile correctly using gcc-4.1.1? The
> > stable version (0.4.11) failed as I'm rebuilding my main AMD64 machine
> > here with the new version of gcc. I'll try 0.4.13 or 0.4.14 later when
> > this whole process finishes, hopefully later today, but I thought I'd
> > ask to see if there are known problems.
> >
> > 575 packages on my system. I started the rebuild on Saturday but
> > had some issues with older C compilers still hanging around. I got
> > them sorted out and now have about 60 packages left. 7 failures so far
> > out of about 515 done.
>
> fwiw, I'm not sure I believe gcc 4.1 on gentoo is ready for prime time.
ive been using gcc 4.1 for about a year (maybe it was 4.1_pre if it wasnt out a year ago). lately things are more likely to compile in 4.1 than in 3.4. all of SWH's plugins (LV2 verions anyway) compiled fine here with 4.1.1.
Hi,
My gcc upgrade is essentially done. Using a ~amd64 swh-plugins it
built fine. I haven't used any of them and may not as I've pretty much
dropped out of the music making business these days. Anyway,
everything ended up building fine after a bit of work.
I tried GAIM and on this machine anyway it sedems to run fine. No
segfaults as of yet.
Cheers,
Mark