| Re: [proaudio] nptl and 2006.1 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] nptl and 2006.1
- From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 07:46:32 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nnQSFDZRkW2AjLKIajW/4Hecyz4jDWtTbGspDjuIVm9hUZxFuqoHREL+O/uTnGpr+zckMkcjN8nQUSLJ8WJWOVgX4AmbKnDbK0H7wEuae+XTXvV29CwzDdNVjDnAgByy5u7kA1DgYqC6IAAjNfBnZOMRjpLD6vGjOXLHaJVUybE=
On 9/9/06, Frieder Bürzele <evermind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
krgn wrote:
> List,
>
> I ask myself whether it is safe to switch to the newest profile
> (2006.1) which switches nptl on? This has, a year ago or so caused
> quite some trouble with jackd and related software, and I cannot find
> any newer posts on that. Do people run this without problems, and is
> it still necessary to put a LD_ASSUME_KERNEL into the environent, so
> jackd gets compiled and runs?
>
> any opinons?
>
> KArsten
>
I'm using the nptl flag.
But I can't compare as I never used gentoo + audio-application without
this flag :)
So wait for other answers
Greetz
Frieder
Hi,
I've used nptlonly for at least 18 months. I've never had a problem
with it as far as I know.
I've never heard of LD_ASSUME_KERNEL so either it's buried in there
somewhere I don't know about or it's not necessary.
HTH,
Mark