| Re: [proaudio] rtirq borked |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] rtirq borked
- From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:07:07 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BuFI8nKG3f2JhZMVdDf3DFD+IPe5yOHVBirZUy6LT85mGHXNzdX7h1/T02FUEgT45UsvgS7KPPqAotICdpA8d4U9ymSNzs/KFTYcPXPAuzQx91vc6oG+UIcITHlmogb7HlfuiV+Wpx4uqjdUWkNcNirMM5paPnP/cWXYIOpA4p0=
On 9/14/06, karsten <k.gebbert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hi:
it seems that rtirq is borked for me. I wonder why, since it seems it
does not have anything to do with the version of it (I tried to
downgrade). Does someone recognize this error?
rambazamba proaudio # rc-config restart rtirq
Restarting init script
* Caching service dependencies ...
[ ok ]
rtirq.sh: start [softirq-timer] pid=5 prio=99: OK.
rtirq.sh: start [softirq-timer] pid=16 prio=99: OK.
rtirq.sh: start [rtc] irq=8 pid=2892 prio=90: OK.
rtirq.sh: start [snd] irq=17 pid=1766 prio=80: OK.
/etc/init.d/rtirq.sh: line 107: 1003 1002: syntax error in expression
(error token is "1002") [ !! ]
I run the ~arch keyword, the version of rtirq is the latest in proaudio.
greets,
Karsten
Karsten,
I am not seeing this myself but on a related matter the desktop
interactivity has become quite bad since my upgrade to gcc-4.1.1. I
seem to be using all 1GB memory when running just Gnome, mythfrontend
and Firefox. Tis wasn't true before as far as I can remember. Using
Alt-tab to switch between windows is quite slow. When I first started
looking at this yesterday I noticed rtirq seemed to have missed
setting the priority of my HDSP card. When I added the card
specifically in the rtirq config file that started working better, but
it's different than when I was using gcc-3.X.
Anyway, I made some changes and things got better, but not as good
as before the gcc upgrade.
- Mark