[proaudio] ardour2 question

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]

To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [proaudio] ardour2 question
From: krgn <k.gebbert@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:22:22 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=psTDHvpj1POLXq64yAChrbcec2SFi9XVZ2yxQp1THNT8X9ZSr3No7MZNOnAZFu0tb1uiSbLg/FLlO/XLNKVqNsht87lUPD1ZgKKvk4MRrQu6//9cZVOd0WE3yQyAq3sgvEtNfGc/2TsTU6hsXBLpDx8cv4+4p/EvfNV7g2BeO5U=

Hi List!

I wonder what other peoples experiences are with ardour2 these day, Ican get it compiled, yet it is extremely unstable/unreliable. Do otherpeople experience this too? I run ~x86 keyword, so maybe this might beconnected? What are your experiences in terms of stability?


Karsten

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [proaudio] ardour2 question
  - From: Reuben Martin

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [proaudio] ardour2 build error
Next by Date: Re: [proaudio] ardour2 question
Previous by thread: Re: [proaudio] ardour2 build error
Next by thread: Re: [proaudio] ardour2 question

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/