| Re: [proaudio] Aqualung anyone? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Aqualung anyone?
- From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:37:50 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F1pxN8j5McwHI1DuKp3Zzrysvkglw5IGgamrHL+fmLoGWUADUPbbRcLe5Qln0qKpRbIoo6djuBl4AnvOudAfe/L7fBlK+v6rEy/dOjmZ4nPTTfDa42OjUBzFzuFaO+fxJ4EwK9kIt31tbi5OxXmDqq46qY9GEGW7EW0i6IdG3yw=
On 6/14/06, Frieder Bürzele <evermind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> I cannot remember if I sent this request along in the past. If I'm
> duplicating myself please excuse me.
>
> Does anyone else here use Aqualung? It's a great player for ripped
> music collections. It's Jack enabled so it works in conjunction with
> Ardour and everything else we use. It works with LADSPA plugins, has
> lots of options for file types, etc., and is generally very stable.
>
> It's easy to build but there is no ebuild for it. I looked at
> making an ebuild myself but not being a programmer it escapes me. If
> someone has a few spare minutes one of these days and wants to do an
> ebuild I sure would appreciate it. PLEASE make sure we have a CVS
> option for the ebuild as I do a lot of testing for Tom and Peter and
> that's what I always run.
>
> Anyway, here's a link of someone is interested:
>
> http://aqualung.sourceforge.net
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
If I find some time I'll do one
btw. there is already one at bugs.gentoo.org but none cvs
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88532
Greetz
Frieder
Hi Frieder,
Thanks in advance. It's a nice player but it has been important to
use CVS since the stable version gets updated very infrequently. There
was an email yesterday from Tom saying he wants to do a feature freeze
and make a new stable version which others seemed to agree with.
I think the problems discussed in that bug were long ago fixed in
CVS but most likely are not in the stable release.
Again, thanks in advance for looking into it.
Cheers,
Mark