Re: [proaudio] fbsplash for -rt

[Frieder Bürzele <evermind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas Kuther wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 20:51:07 +0200
> Frieder Bürzele <evermind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
> > Thomas Kuther wrote:
> >     
> > > On Thu, 18 May 2006 11:11:37 -0700
> > > "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >   
> > >       
> > > > On 5/18/06, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >     
> > > >         
> > > > > On Thu, 18 May 2006 10:43:00 -0700
> > > > > "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >       
> > > > >           
> > > > > > On 5/18/06, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >         
> > > > > >             
> > > > > > > On Thu, 18 May 2006 18:21:44 +0000
> > > > > > > krgn <k.gebbert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >           
> > > > > > >               
> > > > > > > > is it going to be part of the ebuild at some stage?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > KArsten
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >             
> > > > > > > >                 
> > > > > > > Frieder, you want to include it? (don't want to mess around in
> > > > > > > your ebuild ;))
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Uploaded it to our tuxfamily webspace:
> > > > > > > SRC_URI:
> > > > > > > http://proaudio.tuxfamily.org/patches/fbsplash-0.9.2-r5-2.6.16-rt.patch
> > > > > > >           
> > > > > > >               
> > > > > > If you choose to include it please add a USE flag to control its
> > > > > > addition. I do not want to add it to my kernels. If Ingo doesn't
> > > > > > add it then I want to build without it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Mark
> > > > > >
> > > > > >         
> > > > > >             
> > > > > lol, fbsplash has nothing to do with -rt. You do not have to
> > > > > enable it in your kernel config if you do not want it. It's
> > > > > configurable. gentoo-sources also has no useflag for it, so why
> > > > > should rt-sources?
> > > > >
> > > > > Tom
> > > > >       
> > > > >           
> > > > OK - do what you want. Sorry to make a request
> > > >
> > > >     
> > > >         
> > > No it's OK! Sorry if that sounded too harsh, i didn't mean it so
> > > hard. It's just like, to be consequent, that evermind would also
> > > have to make vesafb-tng and realtime-lsm a useflag, because those
> > > two also are not included into Ingo's -rt patch - because both also
> > > have absolutely nothing to do at all with the -rt patch. :)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Tom
> > >
> > >   
> > >       
> > I decided to add it via use, because gentoo also has this useflag for 
> > some at least one package.
> >
> > My  thoughts were the same about the other patches.
> > So for now I can add 3 useflags
> > fbsplash
> > vesatng
> > realtime-lsm
> >
> > or I add one flag to enable all additional patches. So all users are 
> > satisfied.
> > I prefer the second way.
> >
> >     Frieder
> >
> >     
>
> actually i do not care that much, both ways do make sense and are OK.
> vesafb-tng and fbsplash could be bundled to "eyecandy" useflag :) hehe.
>   
now all patches are separated with a useflag

* To enable additional patches for rt-sources use USE-flags
*
* fbsplash - Add support for framebuffer splash
* vesafb-tng - Add a more functional version of the vesafb Linux driver
* realtime-lsm - Add the deprecated realtime modul


   Frieder

>