| Re: [proaudio] fbsplash for -rt |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
On Thu, 18 May 2006 20:51:07 +0200
Frieder Bürzele <evermind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thomas Kuther wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 May 2006 11:11:37 -0700
> > "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 5/18/06, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 18 May 2006 10:43:00 -0700
> >>> "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On 5/18/06, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, 18 May 2006 18:21:44 +0000
> >>>>> krgn <k.gebbert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> is it going to be part of the ebuild at some stage?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> KArsten
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Frieder, you want to include it? (don't want to mess around in
> >>>>> your ebuild ;))
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Uploaded it to our tuxfamily webspace:
> >>>>> SRC_URI:
> >>>>> http://proaudio.tuxfamily.org/patches/fbsplash-0.9.2-r5-2.6.16-rt.patch
> >>>>>
> >>>> If you choose to include it please add a USE flag to control its
> >>>> addition. I do not want to add it to my kernels. If Ingo doesn't
> >>>> add it then I want to build without it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Mark
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> lol, fbsplash has nothing to do with -rt. You do not have to
> >>> enable it in your kernel config if you do not want it. It's
> >>> configurable. gentoo-sources also has no useflag for it, so why
> >>> should rt-sources?
> >>>
> >>> Tom
> >>>
> >> OK - do what you want. Sorry to make a request
> >>
> >>
> >
> > No it's OK! Sorry if that sounded too harsh, i didn't mean it so
> > hard. It's just like, to be consequent, that evermind would also
> > have to make vesafb-tng and realtime-lsm a useflag, because those
> > two also are not included into Ingo's -rt patch - because both also
> > have absolutely nothing to do at all with the -rt patch. :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tom
> >
> >
>
> I decided to add it via use, because gentoo also has this useflag for
> some at least one package.
>
> My thoughts were the same about the other patches.
> So for now I can add 3 useflags
> fbsplash
> vesatng
> realtime-lsm
>
> or I add one flag to enable all additional patches. So all users are
> satisfied.
> I prefer the second way.
>
> Frieder
>
actually i do not care that much, both ways do make sense and are OK.
vesafb-tng and fbsplash could be bundled to "eyecandy" useflag :) hehe.