Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari screen dialog regression |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: Eero Tamminen <oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari screen dialog regression
- From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 09:06:17 +0000
- Cc: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1754816777; bh=VyCd6wbkucvryOPpbStWMBoc58vUs6GR1ujSxvIy2g0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=cokiqunpgLcYOm1HXn61j4BRbcVv/RQQyNds3hBhRmcxCo2J68an9Z50MCVZc9V8E i3U+uXKDcvkMkfMMIXomUcnd3VcROneh7cqcyhPoHvkQgO0UfkXKQzUrJQFUtQWZ9f 14onQjjP+YhRbEfVDkAAoALXVqLJZXUWOGWTK80vU8OTX6doPOxzNtjemGHE6pFdL4 8w+wusx7jZAOeIVNOULrVtGMuXph7LAu7monwiPjkzp8uxA0vPDqW/PpsnuVxJ1bCG PZoxBKY/AzQFvBzkdtIYsWhm9VZALeVoxOQS8X/yBn4Y/eXG6EolKFOPORMqiX8lZk LIMACVEa777Rw==
Am Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:30:20 +0300
schrieb Eero Tamminen <oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> On 2.8.2025 23.24, Nicolas Pomarède wrote:
> > looking at the patches, they look ok to me. But as there's also a lot of
> > changes, I don't have time at the moment to check all the possible
> > situations where these patches could change the behaviour when using
> > Hatari and its UI.
> >
> > I guess you tested them and they work, so on my side I'm ok to push
> > these if you think everything is complete.
>
> I've tested changes related to AVI & screenshot saving functionality,
> but not everything related to options.c changes in the "Support for
> checking whether given option dir exists" patch, so it would be good to
> check that more closely.
>
> Thomas, could you check the patch series too?
Sorry, I currently don't have the capacity to review bigger patch series.
But I noticed that the screen dialog is currently still broken when you run
Hatari without borders and without status bar (e.g. in monochrome mode when
disabling the status bar). Dialogs must not be bigger than 80x25 characters.
@Nicolas, I think this should get fixed before the 2.6.1 release.
Thomas