Re: [hatari-devel] relative perf between 030 / DSP / CPU?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]


Le 26/06/2025 à 17:44, Eero Tamminen a écrit :
Hi,

On 26.6.2025 10.01, Nicolas Pomarède wrote:
Le 25/06/2025 à 22:34, Eero Tamminen a écrit :
On 25.6.2025 10.56, Nicolas Pomarède wrote:
...
address translation, page swap in case physical page is available or not. Also I think the read/write functions themselves are not the cycle accurate "plain 68030" version when MMU is used, because MMU is not cycle accurate at the time and using CE memory access functions would just slow down everything for no real accuracy gain

Enabling MMU emulation on top of CE slows Hatari noticeably, that's why I though that it least _tries_ to be cycle-accurate...

in MMU mode every memory access must have its address compared to the TTx registers and possibly to the MMU "tree" that contains all physical<->logical mapping, so this will slow down emulation a lot, even if no translation are in place, you still need to check it on every access. This overhead is much higher than the CE overhead.



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/