Re: [hatari-devel] Strange timestamp issue

[Thorsten Otto <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Samstag, 27. Juli 2024 11:03:07 CEST Uwe Seimet wrote:

> but what about never setting the timestamp on the Linux side to the

> future but to "now" instead?

The timestamp of the file is not explicitly set by Pure-C when you save a file. Instead, it is assumed to be the same that Tgettime() returns. If Tgettime() returns something different (eg. because of fast-forward), those 2 times will differ.

I already mentioned that behaviour long time ago, thinking that a 200hz timer should always be 200Hz, regardless of emulation speed. But probably this would break lots of timing dependant tricks.