| Re: [hatari-devel] Falcon tests |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Falcon tests
- From: Anders Eriksson <evldhs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 08:54:21 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1654505664; x=1654764864; bh=rPHA2EWmFcM1poPE8QF9WZboWsifSGa9J8E1HwH7YOU=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=KQT1E5rJ7HMQifyBRfla5OgR62XL3z0+DlSLVje1bmY3cK2PHkffcbsiHexgSxnpc oQ6sEX0W+q67BSOXViEL6iLJxmEj6cVg9cBMc5jAGUde5l3z3W9Gm7ipw4uEwPoPHf P8XtMbZhOIw2Me3bVJa+n7D4xVDgnx3aoaEz5w++qAgcA4IHSRe74cZZL3IHd9Vugl wsSd6e2Rz97/5QrKoNeQ6G2BNbozbluCs/WkTeDXQppYt29v5C6ov14M/y5R2Dwf+j U+rTxeGkA05oE9dbG7N9W+XWKUCQqjZP+rG263cDjeaDnQcxl/jiHQrhgsCybj5van bXRd7/xongtxA==
- Feedback-id: 41365795:user:proton
------- Original Message -------
On Monday, June 6th, 2022 at 09:13, Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le 06/06/2022 à 09:07, Anders Eriksson a écrit :
>
> > ------- Original Message -------
> > On Sunday, June 5th, 2022 at 12:41, Eero Tamminen oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 5.6.2022 12.22, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> >
> > > If these had audio issues, diff was not clear enough for me to hear:
> > > * DHS: 4orce (4K)
> > > * New Beat: Flu (4K)
> > >
> > > Anders, as I assume you to be familiar with "4orce", maybe you could
> > > check it better? :-)
> >
> > These two sound fine, they not using PCM/DMA just the YM3439.
> >
> > However I think the emulated machine feel slow, not that my host machine is too slow to emulate, it doesn't skip any frames with AUTO frameskip.
> >
> > So I ran Gembench 4 for a quick test, and yeah it confirms that it runs sluggish.
> >
> > GEM Bench v4.03 ｽ Ofir Gal - 3 March 95
> > ============================================
> > Falcon 030 TOS 4.04
> > AES v3.40
> > GEMDOS v0.48
> > MiNT not present
> > Blitter Enabled
> > NVDI not present
> > Video Mode: 6404802
> > LineF FPU installed
> > Run and Malloc from STRAM
> > Ref: F030 + FPU, 6404802
> > Hatari 2.4.0 dev 20220604
> > No prefetch, no cycle exact, no mmu,
> > no softfpu, 24bit addressing on
> > ============================================
> > GEM Dialog Box: 4.425 79%
> > VDI Text: 4.305 78%
> > VDI Text Effects: 13.050 57%
> > VDI Small Text: 4.860 77%
> > VDI Graphics: 21.160 41%
> > GEM Window: 1.760 79%
> > Integer Division: 1.145 270%
> > Float Math: 0.250 136%
> > RAM Access: 3.570 61%
> > ROM Access: 3.565 58%
> > Blitting: 1.170 95%
> > VDI Scroll: 2.955 89%
> > Justified Text: 4.105 79%
> > VDI Enquire: 2.205 71%
> > New Dialogs: 6.260 71%
> > ============================================
> > Graphics: 74%
> > CPU: 131%
> > Average: 89%
> >
> > Perhaps my settings are wrong?
> >
> > hatari --machine falcon --dsp emu --cpulevel 3 --cpuclock 16 --fpu 68882 --cpu-exact 0 --compatible 0 --addr24 1 --timer-d 0 --memsize 14 --window --frameskips 0 --drive-led false --monitor vga --avi-vcodec png --png-level 2 --sound 49170 --fast-boot 1 --tos /xyz/Falcon/404.img --gemdos-drive c --harddrive /xyz/Atari
>
>
> Hi
>
> do you get different results with hatari 2.3.1 ? (it shouldn't)
>
> for me, it's just that 68030 cycles counting is not accurate yet, some
> intructions will take more/less cycles than real HW and in the end you
> don't get 100% for all tests.
You are right, 2.3.1 yeilds the same result.
If I were to guess, the 61% speed of RAM access is probably the "worst" of it. Falcons big bottleneck is RAM-speed to begin with :)
--
Anders Eriksson
ae@xxxxxx