| Re: [hatari-devel] MMU impact on emulated perf? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] MMU impact on emulated perf?
- From: Christian Zietz <czietz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 16:26:28 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1633271188; bh=muQky2Oa3qdcE9/Gq58Ee97hT/6LJO8Q5tmFoFI54Ts=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=C8oWPa+X+IJAzhVfp8Uw+oAJnf2n2vL5aHmMThYqhBa0Vv/4Tq/sbOBowMLRx80D7 rs/foZ3NkAE5QzNXErv3N33pNzx+iDgL5yO9KMy0qvBq7kPlUIpfD0y4SLOGVvEClj loDIZfpT1jLH4XZ5/7NTO/FVhfVDvYDjt3naLKn8=
Eero Tamminen schrieb:
According to Zamuel's latest post, there's something odd in Hatari CACR
handling:
https://www.atari-forum.com/viewtopic.php?p=423066#p423066
Not that I want to investigate, but if I were to do so, I would ask him
for his program that he constantly keeps referring to; the one that
gives so and so many FPS. Otherwise, it's just guesswork, I'm afraid. My
investigation with CoreMark show that Hatari's Falcon emulation is not
fully accurate, but this doesn't have to have the same cause as for his
program.
Regards
Christian
--
Christian Zietz - CHZ-Soft - czietz@xxxxxxx
WWW: https://www.chzsoft.de/
PGP/GnuPG-Key-ID: 0x52CB97F66DA025CA / 0x6DA025CA