Le 30/11/2020 à 22:47, Laurent Sallafranque a écrit :
Hi,
I don't know if this will help, but the bisect of Suzie gives the
following result (between hatari V1.6.2 and hatari 1.7.0) :
4db18160c6141ef9a74dd0308eee41da3729a33f is the first bad commit
commit 4db18160c6141ef9a74dd0308eee41da3729a33f
Author: Laurent Sallafranque <laurent.sallafranque@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Feb 1 19:55:43 2013 +0100
change: take into account the 68030 cycles in cache mode ON
src/cpu/newcpu.c | 11 +++++------
src/includes/m68000.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Hi
thanks for bisecting the issue ; unfortunately, if it's a 68030 cycle
accuracy problem, there's not much that can be done at the moment.
even if winuae improved a lot for 68020/030 (mmu, bus/address errors,
...), cycles emulation is not accurate enough yet. In some case it
will be better than older Hatari version, in some other cases it will
be worse.
Nicolas