| Re: [hatari-devel] CentOS and libreadline |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] CentOS and libreadline
- From: Christian Zietz <czietz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:12:28 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1588173148; bh=ElnEHBRf8hTYJNam/ihO2NylMig49EJGcB58kjW/WcA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LWnK1Eoj3ASMbp8aNr3R1AbrMwqjyIv5YZyvGkyKybFKEh4QBnq2B5vuOxyB1j7Yp JQ3EjoAzaMirN/kivDDpvD/POsVO5XfArHOYGnVBAk7u960UlXzihKlsV10CReVcgr Tw905cwjqb6CVvpB3BjV/HevcICkDezCnymMdBCs=
Christer Solskogen schrieb:
> On Ubuntu I see this during cmake:
>
> -- Looking for rl_filename_completion_function
> -- Looking for rl_filename_completion_function - found
>
>
> But I don't see that on CentOS.
This painfully reminds of me of how I once spent many hours trying to
get CMake to recognize the libraries I had clearly installed -- albeit
under Windows. I guess, this automatic CMake "magic" isn't as robust as
one would think.
I remember that back then I used some kind of CMake debug/trace output
to see what was going on. Maybe you try enabling that as well and
compare the CentOS output with a working version?
Regards
Christian
--
Christian Zietz - CHZ-Soft - czietz@xxxxxxx
WWW: https://www.chzsoft.de/
PGP/GnuPG-Key-ID: 0x52CB97F66DA025CA / 0x6DA025CA