Re: [hatari-devel] Drive image byteswap confusion |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Drive image byteswap confusion
- From: Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:43:53 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1571557433; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=seimet.de; h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=XidHrjVqa0vx5nhNqeR46H13TKXnTozU3/tr4vF7JdU=; b=mf7dUbiW/VZQ5n8xd4BlXP5Qir/O9IKHfriMX1Hhj9wrbxyhjC0vsFRP++9e3mFNvo r0+3LQWHX4X81aPa46LtNC6FVurbz4TaC1ntYAI4pbwkb+Ba651RsOau6FSF6joV8w9K //E4S64nkRw97wqANzkbOySOPN2I8wbzabjawyt+9wPFc5Tu1nIeJTbs6gNKBKiKBCMK LOLq6056mdDgffZmD6dMcVVuwnEZwloqXkX93vCmbled2bC5zUd8jUv+0Ch2TJD38WAT iiOqs+pSsqoSBUdnYwFiF8b88Qnon6LC0TCiY9Sgn7SWdthmXbZhyTZn9q4bmFpOgvjU 3wtQ==
Hi,
> Am Fri, 18 Oct 2019 21:11:40 +0200
> schrieb Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > This looks wrong to me. When byteswapping is configured to be off,
> > it's actually enabled and Hatari reports:
>
> There is no real right and wrong here. It always depends on where you've
> imaged your disk, the original disk layout, and your expectations.
I'm afraid this is still not clear to me. I created a new image with
dd if=/dev/zero of=some_image_file ...
When byteswapping is switched off and I partition this image (assigned
to a Hatari IDE drive), the byte order is not what it would have been with
a real Atari with standard IDE interface. Instead, the resulting byte
order is the one used by ACSI/SCSI.
> Anyway, we can not simply change the meaning here without causing much
> more confusion. I'd suggest to simply use the "Auto" setting and stop
> worrying about this.
"Auto" may be fine when dealing with existing images. But I often want
to create a new bootable (with a real Atari) image with Hatari. In such
a case it's important to have full control of the byte order. Otherwise
you end up with different results, depending on the original byte order
of the image.
Best regards
Uwe