| Re: [hatari-devel] Patch to fix disassembler |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Patch to fix disassembler
- From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 15:40:30 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1547304037; bh=Dj2jKt+oIzVWdx/6svfcFAwcwIa/mhPfx9l+V2ofmyc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=XX/avFIVCUWf0m0Vkl4LsuUzf0fcKmcdhb65Lq51W5G33j23swqu46fDraWR9Xeax sUlBvjCVPqEW64K6Brt56YinoHWGimyrp2hSxheBApdrtf+UhsbhK3/tmTmxB9yvjC SyrZcan7R4Y0OIdvRhLhIuUNHlw0mAi6HeRGO8NzK5EcfnIA1aMsGX5C/HRYZExT1m X5gKbUE+CNUCze4HZbaHLe3A5seYhG7YGqij7M9vGkbkcXuGSvDVum38w3euPk8hgA 6zmiZGvDd9fxMSmXns0DXwVzJyEGmrLwlZz20ym7jc0IAG7c4E52MY/lIY7NjssApr /h0v1HV+Yzt8Q==
Am Mon, 07 Jan 2019 10:31:08 +0100
schrieb Thorsten Otto <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a patch to fix a few issues with the external
> disassembler (non- uae, in src/debug/68kDisass.c) . It did not set
> the options correctly for 060, and also ommited FPU opcodes for 040
> and 060.
Thanks, I've added the part for the FPU now. Looking at MC_PMMU, this
seems still to be somewhat fishy for me. Why is it not enabled for
68020 and 68030, they could have a PMMU, too? Or is this flag only
meant for the newer PMMU of the 68040 and 68060? Should we maybe tie it
to the ConfigureParams.System.bMMU setting in Hatari instead? And why
is the MC_PMMU macro the very same as the MC_FPU macro?? That does not
make much sense to me yet... Any ideas?
Thomas