| Re: [hatari-devel] Timestamp problem with GEMDOS drive |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Timestamp problem with GEMDOS drive
- From: David Savinkoff <dsavnkff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 12:37:32 -0700 (MST)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telus.net; s=neo; t=1487446652; bh=/piHYWnvuR7/v104aFoKNrcjkHcsY2w0w3fb65HR6BA=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:Subject; b=N0bx2sni6dPWe8QnTiJyJCbjv6+GK5ocAAvcX2nNoTVFgKtio66iHEDEa0cBs6mI/ +s3uhkPsaSOTcjxNaoJGdWtdw0hKLa6q25IFfZwQUIF7337E6jAQntlQx+4jygT8Du xkOsL9LUbM89mDUfIJag0xeaQops0DiwXu/6hjUBX/mxGj9hIRr5+ylSKNJarV+dBH uO8iMDBu4KuDXq68gzWngim2ycGq+VMljBymRYQrRQl/Nr9SsLJiuPRowaZ2aJiaQP bmtvbv0nN1GMSvgwqFX3/P76VvIX65ccHV+FBeWYsG2fHB6imbpBkHQL1ZHKSDVvah 01UwuZJWkGmIQ==
- Thread-index: bGBbQZ947h5zRbGkXC+EZ2Js1mFX9Q==
- Thread-topic: Timestamp problem with GEMDOS drive
----- Uwe Seimet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the current development version I observe wrong timestamps when
> compiling with Pure C. A C source file A.C has the timestamp 10:21.
> After compiling it to A.O the resulting object file has the timestamp
> 10:20, i.e. it is not newer but older than the source file.
> This is reproducable. The desktop shows that .O files are a minute older
> than the .C files they were compiled from.
>
> Take care
>
> Uwe
>
>
AFAIK
Hatari changed how it deals with the time of day.
Hatari grabs the current time when it is started, then
increments the time in "emulator time". This is causing
a conflict with the "actual time" as regards time stamps.