Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update

To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
From: Douglas Little <doug694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:23:28 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=h979adFqcegI8xmEfz6fXrExvfvU91FHvQaQJVxivk4=; b=dIP8054YpP/lRBFcG9SilqtwWcGOuBcQdVzhHcWgqnUm7ai6yPZ3kflLOnbJkV9vWI 6QSHDeTjgWRXPK49trmsDjrspglPBcYRVQMz7Kb7F4XQMwcm2hgM9Egdezp4/XI7dBWm w33mm8PHDdkQvRS5s3TbRR+3ZTxSZ/4+XhqsTGwtBjKGXWXrKUNbn5yZlvfsjcgaCEpW Zezx2x/bpfNL+L+5FsMl3HE+J2XO0zevV185O5+FBEfpXzVqya9ErTwKsBuHShHvpbXR o96iCkAPXSo0AJhLSmXH0hS3AlgotIPZ9GnIjj/WJorcjY7rQ8zOvhwIdfy3na5RynxE MJXw==

Thanks. Screenshot attached again, same 3 errors but operands seems to
make more sense now :) Also all following tests pass.

That does look more sensible yes :-)

(For some reason the assembler allowed me 'addq.l #12,a3' without a complaint...)

References:
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Douglas Little
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Toni Wilen
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Douglas Little
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Andreas Grabher
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Toni Wilen
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Douglas Little
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Toni Wilen

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+