Hi Eero,
Am Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:26:49 +0200
schrieb Eero Tamminen <oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 12/28/2015 10:30 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
schrieb Eero Tamminen <oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Now it looks like user is selecting whether each shortcut
should be invoked with shortcut or not. I.e. modifier
belonging to shortcut, instead of the other way round.
It might be clearer if the modifier selection would be before
shortcut name, and name is indented a bit, to indicate that
shortcuts with and without modifier are two separate sets.
Ok, feel free to re-arrange the dialog if that makes more sense.
I think it's actually most clear to show both keys for
given shortcut, and have separate Define button for each.
What do you think of the attached patch (it also tells
user if shortcut got changed because it was duplicate)?
That indeed looks easier to use than my original version. Please
go ahead and commit it!
Thanks,
Thomas